Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 March 20263374628

Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT

Planning appeal 3374628 at Assemble Spaces, Albert Hall Albert Street, Whitstable, CT5 1HT (Canterbury City Council) was allowed on 5 March 2026 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the loss of a community facility.

Change of Use of existing Hall to 2No. 3-bed dwellings (following partial demolition) and erection of 2No. two-storey, 3-bed dwellings (with accommodation in the roof space) with parking and external amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
CT5 1HT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the loss of a community facility
  • the effect of the proposed development on the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA and Thames, Medway & Swale SPA

What decided it

The financial contribution towards SPA mitigation measures secured through unilateral undertaking was sufficient to address the adverse effects on the protected sites, and the loss of community facility was not unjustified given the marketing evidence and financial constraints on alternative uses.

The benefits of housing delivery, supported by the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, were balanced against the loss of a community facility and ecological impacts; the ecological impacts were mitigated through the financial contribution, and the community facility loss was not unjustified, allowing the appeal to proceed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QL6Policy SP1Policy SP6Policy LB5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

81 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed26 March 20263374468
    The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
  2. Allowed26 February 20263373183
    Land off The Hill, Littlebourne, CT3 1UX
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 August 20253362152
    Land at Romany Green Acre, Well Lane, Fordwich, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 0DU
  4. Dismissed22 May 20253358230
    143 Faversham Road, Seasalter, Kent, CT5 4SD
  5. Dismissed21 May 20253359117
    13 Gordon Road, Herne Bay, CT6 5QX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.