Planning appeal decision
Woodford Garden Village Extension, Former Woodford Aerodrome, Woodford Stockport, SK7 1NX
Planning appeal 3373210 at Woodford Garden Village Extension, Former Woodford Aerodrome, Woodford Stockport, SK7 1NX (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 13 March 2026 by Inspector Shrigley M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue is the acceptability of education and sports infrastructure provision, in the context of paragraphs 155-159 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) regarding the Green Belt and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 compliance.
Outline planning permission with all matters reserved for a new residential led development comprising demolition of the existing employment building and structures; erection of residential dwellings, extra care accommodation and a local community hub; creation of new vehicle, cycle and pedestrian connections, open space, landscaping and other associated works
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Shrigley M
- Postcode
- SK7 1NX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue is the acceptability of education and sports infrastructure provision, in the context of paragraphs 155-159 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) regarding the Green Belt and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 compliance.
What decided it
The completed planning obligation's education and sports infrastructure covenants satisfied Framework paragraph 156(b) and the CIL Regulation 122 tests, and the substantial housing and other benefits outweighed the identified less-than-substantial heritage harm under the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance.
The substantial benefits of significantly boosting housing supply, affordable housing, self-build provision, open space and biodiversity net gain, combined with compliant Golden Rules infrastructure contributions, outweighed the less than substantial heritage harm and limited-weight policy conflicts, tipping the paragraph 11(d) balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy AS-2CS Policy SIE-2saved policy L1.1CS Policy H-3CS Policy CS9CS Policy CS10Policy T-1CS Policy SIE-3Policy CS3GBA1.2GBA1.5GBA1.7CS policy CS8CS policy SIE-1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 158Paragraph 159Paragraph 11Paragraph 64Paragraph 193Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed16 July 2026600825545 Finney Lane, Heald Green, Cheadle, SK8 3DY
- Dismissed24 March 20263362376Jose Lomas Farm, Gird Lane, Marple Bridge, Stockport, Cheshire, SK6 5LP
- Allowed16 March 20263366984Land To Rear Of 12 Heathcote Avenue, Heaton Norris, Stockport, SK4 2QF
- Allowed14 January 20263368530Cheadle Heath Works, Stockport Road, Cheadle Heath, SK3 0PR
- Allowed7 January 20253349825Gatley Golf Club, Styal Road, Gatley, Cheadle, SK8 3TW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®