Planning appeal decision
Woodford Garden Village Extension, Former Woodford Aerodrome, Woodford Stockport, SK7 1NX
- Authority
- Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Shrigley M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue is the acceptability of education and sports infrastructure provision, in the context of paragraphs 155-159 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) regarding the Green Belt and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 compliance.
What decided it
The completed planning obligation's education and sports infrastructure covenants satisfied Framework paragraph 156(b) and the CIL Regulation 122 tests, and the substantial housing and other benefits outweighed the identified less-than-substantial heritage harm under the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance.
The substantial benefits of significantly boosting housing supply, affordable housing, self-build provision, open space and biodiversity net gain, combined with compliant Golden Rules infrastructure contributions, outweighed the less than substantial heritage harm and limited-weight policy conflicts, tipping the paragraph 11(d) balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
Framework references: 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 11, 64, 193, 215
Plan policies cited: CS Policy AS-2, CS Policy SIE-2, saved policy L1.1, CS Policy H-3, CS Policy CS9, CS Policy CS10, Policy T-1, CS Policy SIE-3, Policy CS3, GBA1.2, GBA1.5, GBA1.7, CS policy CS8, CS policy SIE-1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®