Planning appeal decision
Jose Lomas Farm, Gird Lane, Marple Bridge, Stockport, Cheshire, SK6 5LP
Planning appeal 3362376 at Jose Lomas Farm, Gird Lane, Marple Bridge, Stockport, Cheshire, SK6 5LP (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 March 2026 by Inspector Major R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
conversion of existing stables and extension to form farm house
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Major R
- Postcode
- SK6 5LP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- whether, having regard to national planning policy that seeks to avoid isolated new homes in the countryside, there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker
- whether the proposed development meets statutory biodiversity net gain objectives
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for recreation and amenity open space arising from the occupation of the proposed development
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate an essential need for a permanent rural worker's dwelling, combined with the failure to meet statutory biodiversity net gain requirements, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The tilted balance applied due to the lack of a five-year housing land supply, but the significant harm from the isolated home conflict with paragraph 84 and the significant weight given to the BNG failure were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited/moderate benefits (housing, economic, self-build, renewable energy), so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- GBA1.1GBA1.2GBA1.5GBA1.6Policy SIE-2L1.2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 66Paragraph 73Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 91Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld27 July 20263361397Mill Hill Farm Arden Road, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SB
- Allowed16 March 20263366984Land To Rear Of 12 Heathcote Avenue, Heaton Norris, Stockport, SK4 2QF
- Allowed13 March 20263373210Woodford Garden Village Extension, Former Woodford Aerodrome, Woodford Stockport, SK7 1NX
- Allowed2 February 20263374953Land Adjacent to 456 Chester Road, Woodford, Stockport, Cheshire, SK7 1QS
- Dismissed26 August 20253366724Seven Oaks, Jacksons Lane, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 5JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®