Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 March 20263373234

Land adj. Newtonside Orchard, Burfield Road, Old Windsor, Windsor, SL4 2RE

‘Use of land as a caravan site for the siting of up to 4 mobile homes for human habitation’

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Willows P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate was well founded, which turns on whether, on the date of the application, the use of the land as a caravan site for the siting of up to 4 mobile homes for human habitation would have amounted to a material change of use

What decided it

The finding that the appeal site and the established caravan site formed a single planning unit already lawfully used as a caravan site, so the additional mobile homes would not amount to a material change of use.

Judgments cited: Palser v Grinling [1948] AC 291; East Barnet UDC v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484; Hertfordshire CC v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Metal Waste Recycling Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1473; Reed v Secretary of State of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 241; Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Hertfordshire CC v SSCLG & Metal and Waste Recycling Ltd [2012] EWHC 277 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.