Planning appeal decision
15a Station Road, Epping, Essex, CM16 4HG
Planning appeal 3373694 at 15a Station Road, Epping, Essex, CM16 4HG (Epping Forest District Council) was dismissed on 27 January 2026 by Inspector Caine M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).
‘Demolition of existing attached office and erection of replacement building containing office space and 6 apartments.’
- Authority
- Epping Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Caine M
- Postcode
- CM16 4HG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
- Whether the proposed development would provide an acceptable living environment for future residents, with particular reference to outlook, light, and waste storage arrangements
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety in respect of car parking provision and cycle storage
What decided it
The unacceptably harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the non-designated heritage asset, combined with unacceptable living conditions for future residents and unacceptable loss of privacy to neighbouring residents, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
The substantial harms to character and appearance, heritage setting, and living conditions of future residents and neighbours significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited social, economic and environmental benefits, resulting in the proposal failing to constitute sustainable development under the tilted balance test.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM9Policy DM7Policy DM10Policy T1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Epping Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed12 August 202660045908 Ollards Grove, Loughton, IG10 4DW
- Allowed10 July 2026600261339, Dukes Avenue, Theydon Bois, CM16 7HG
- Allowed2 March 20263376029The Glen, Bournebridge Lane, Romford, RM4 1LT
- Allowed19 February 20263375075Land Adjacent to 33 Maypole Drive, Chigwell, Essex, IG7 6DE
- Dismissed23 December 20253374610Manor Farm Mott Street, Loughton, IG10 4AP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®