Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 March 20263374199

Longacre, Wolverhampton Road, Nurton, Staffordshire, WV6 7AD

Planning appeal 3374199 at Longacre, Wolverhampton Road, Nurton, Staffordshire, WV6 7AD (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 10 March 2026 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

a two-storey rear extension and single storey side/rear extension and alterations to create a new access

Authority
South Staffordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
VW6 7AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area
  • If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm by reason of disproportionate additions, combined with significant harm to character and appearance, which was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight afforded to the fallback position and the appellant's personal circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy EQ4Policy EQ11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 142

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266012641
    The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
  2. Allowed25 September 20266010537
    Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266008866
    The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
  4. Dismissed12 August 20266010048
    Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
  5. Dismissed15 July 20266007394
    White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.