Planning appeal decision
Kensington Lodge, Main Road, Dibden, Southampton, SO45 5TD
Planning appeal 3374397 at Kensington Lodge, Main Road, Dibden, Southampton, SO45 5TD (New Forest) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Shields T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether use of the land as a single pitch caravan site is in a suitable location with particular regard to: (i) the locational need for the site; (ii) the effect on the character and appearance of the area and the scenic beauty of the New Forest National Park (NFNP); (iii) the effects on biodiversity and ecology with regard to the New Forest Special Protection Area (SPA) and the Solent and Southampton SPA; and (iv) whether any resulting harm would be outweighed by other material considerations in the overall balance.
Material change of use of land for stationing a caravan for residential purposes to provide a single gypsy/traveller pitch, together with operational development comprising a storage container and hard surfacing
- Authority
- New Forest
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Shields T
- Postcode
- SO45 5TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether use of the land as a single pitch caravan site is in a suitable location with particular regard to: (i) the locational need for the site; (ii) the effect on the character and appearance of the area and the scenic beauty of the New Forest National Park (NFNP); (iii) the effects on biodiversity and ecology with regard to the New Forest Special Protection Area (SPA) and the Solent and Southampton SPA; and (iv) whether any resulting harm would be outweighed by other material considerations in the overall balance.
What decided it
The substantial harm to the character, appearance and scenic beauty of the National Park, combined with unmitigated significant harm to protected habitats due to a defective Unilateral Undertaking, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of pitch provision and the appellant's personal circumstances.
the substantial harm to the character and scenic beauty of the National Park and the significant, unmitigated harm to protected habitats significantly and demonstrably outweighed the significant benefits of pitch supply shortfall, personal circumstances and facilitating the nomadic way of life, under NPPF paragraph 11(d)(ii)
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP2Policy SP17Policy SP33Policy SP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 189Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice upheld11 May 20263345956153 Woodlands Road, Ashurst, Southampton, Hampshire, SO40 7BH
- Notice upheld11 May 20263342251Duck Hill Farm, Newbridge , Cadnam, New Forest , SO40 2NW
- Notice varied and upheld29 April 20263375133Land West of Lynwood, Rossiters Lane, Woodlands, Hants, SO40 7HX
- Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263328653Northerwood Avenue, , Lyndhurst, SO43 7DU
- Notice varied and upheld9 March 20263358413Dale Farm, Manor Road, Dibden, Southampton, SO45 5TJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®