Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20263374412

19 Ashridge Court, Redcroft Road, Southall, UB1 3PA

Planning appeal 3374412 at 19 Ashridge Court, Redcroft Road, Southall, UB1 3PA (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 2 February 2026 by Inspector Tinsley F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, particularly with regard to height.

‘Erection of infill to provide x4 2-bedroom residential units following the demolition of existing infill’

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tinsley F
Postcode
UB1 3PA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, particularly with regard to height
  • Whether the transport impacts of the development would be acceptable, with regard to cycle storage provision and the proposed crossover
  • Whether adequate waste-storage facilities would be provided on site

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area arising primarily from the height and massing of the proposed development, which would remove a beneficial visual break and create an incongruous form within the context of the surrounding three-storey terraces.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4DMDPD Policy 7.4DMDPD Policy 7BLondon Plan Policy HC1DMDPD Policy 7CLondon Plan Policy T3London Plan Policy T4London Plan Policy T5London Plan Policy SI 7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

283 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Dismissed30 April 20266003619
    4 - 6 Ealing Road, Northolt, UB5 5HT
  4. Notice upheld2 April 20263367385
    19 Wedmore Road, Greenford, UB6 8SB
  5. Notice upheld2 April 20263367259
    17 Wedmore Road, Greenford, UB6 8SB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.