Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 March 20263374500

Ruskin House , Mead Close, Denhnam , Buckinghamshire, UB9 5AZ

proposed alterations to the roof; single storey rear extension and single storey side extension”

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hughes S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The fallback position of permitted development (garden room and loft conversion) would result in greater dispersal and loss of openness than the consolidated appeal scheme, constituting very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm from inappropriateness.

Framework references: 154, 156, 219

Plan policies cited: GB1, GB10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.