Planning appeal decision
The Staffordshire Golf Club, Bridgnorth Road, Swindon, Dudley, DY3 4PU
Planning appeal 3374824 at The Staffordshire Golf Club, Bridgnorth Road, Swindon, Dudley, DY3 4PU (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 4 February 2026 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for housing with regard to local and national policies.
demolition of existing golf clubhouse and driving range buildings and redevelopment to include erection of three new houses with detached garages and associated parking and garden areas
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
- Postcode
- DY3 4PU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for housing with regard to local and national policies
- Whether the appeal development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and the development plan, and the effect of the appeal development on the openness of the Green Belt and purposes of including land within it
- The effect of the proposed surface water strategy on the water environment
- Whether adequate provision can be made for biodiversity net gain
- If the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, would the harm, by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the unsuitability of the location for housing, combined with the absence of very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development, outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and substantial harm to openness, together with the unsuitability of the location for housing, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations including modest housing contribution, limited socio-economic benefits, and sustainable construction standards.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1Core Strategy Policy GB1Core Strategy Policy EQ7Core Strategy Policy EQ1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®