Planning appeal decision
Parast, Broadbridge Lane, Broadbridge Lane, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9RD
Planning appeal 3374877 at Parast, Broadbridge Lane, Broadbridge Lane, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9RD (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 28 January 2026 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework.
permission in principle for up to 9 dwellings
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
- Postcode
- RH6 9RD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the proposal is in a sustainable location
- if the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to satisfy criterion (c) of paragraph 155 of the Framework because the site is not in a suitable location with reference to paragraphs 110 and 115, as future occupiers would lack safe and reliable access to services and sustainable transport modes, and therefore cannot benefit from the Grey Belt exception to inappropriate development.
The substantial weight afforded to harm to the Green Belt and the significant weight afforded to loss of openness and unsustainable location were not clearly outweighed by the substantial weight given to the provision of nine dwellings in the context of housing land supply shortfall, and the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP5Policy DP1Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®