Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 March 20263375057

48 Middleton Way, Fen Drayton , Cambridgeshire , CB24 4SU

Planning appeal 3375057 at 48 Middleton Way, Fen Drayton , Cambridgeshire , CB24 4SU (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 2 March 2026 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on protected species and biodiversity.

construction of self-build, eco-friendly 1.5 storey dwelling with detached garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hickey A
Postcode
CB24 4SU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on protected species and biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on flooding
  • whether the site is a suitable location for residential development, having regard to local and national policy and its accessibility by sustainable modes of transport

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on three independent grounds—inadequate ecological survey evidence, unassessed surface water flood risk, and an unsustainable location lacking safe access by sustainable transport modes—and no material considerations of sufficient weight indicate the decision should be taken otherwise.

The limited self-build, housing supply, economic and environmental benefits attracted little to modest weight and were outweighed by the significant harms arising from inadequate ecological information, unmanaged flood risk, and unsustainable location.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NH/4Policy CC/9Policy H/5Policy S/2Policy S/7Policy TI/2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed23 October 20266005101
    Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266010417
    Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266008631
    19 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011793
    Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
  5. Dismissed2 October 20266011365
    Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.