Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 January 20263375082

Land at Eastfield Stables, May Walk, Elsenham Road, Stansted, Essex, CM24 8SS

Planning appeal 3375082 at Land at Eastfield Stables, May Walk, Elsenham Road, Stansted, Essex, CM24 8SS (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 9 January 2026 by Inspector Dade E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy.

erection of 3-bay cartlodge ancillary to the approved holiday lets and associated development

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Dade E
Postcode
CM24 8SS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would harmfully encroach into the open central paddock and erode the site's rural character, and this harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest economic and environmental benefits.

The harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest economic benefits and small environmental benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S7 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Uttlesford District-Wide Design Code 2024 M3.1CUttlesford District-Wide Design Code 2024 ID1.1C
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 232Paragraph 187Paragraph 135Paragraph 88Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

88 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Uttlesford District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed4 September 20266008264
    Land to the West of The Cottage, Snakes Lane, Ugley Green, CM22 6HW
  2. Dismissed24 August 20266005461
    Chelmer House, Braintree Road, Great Dunmow, CM6 1HT
  3. Dismissed17 July 20266005499
    Land Adjacent Langford Drive, Palmers Lane, Chrishall, SG8 8DX
  4. Allowed19 March 20263370631
    Land off Bedwell Road, Elsenham, CM22 6JQ
  5. Dismissed12 March 20263373979
    Dunwell Chapel End, Broxted, Dunmow, CM6 2BW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.