Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 February 20263375390

Iphigenia, Woodham Road, Rettendon, Wickford, ESSEX, SS11 7QW

single storey side and rear extension

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The disproportionate nature of the cumulative extensions (over 300% increase in floor area) combined with demonstrable harm to Green Belt openness could not be justified by the modest benefits claimed, as the harm was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DM11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.