Planning appeal decision
35 Highfield Lane, Tyttenhanger, ST. ALBANS, AL4 0RH
small rear extension to square off back of house, extend side extension to back of house
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Bennett T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal, despite exceeding quantitative SPG thresholds, would not result in a disproportionate addition when assessed against qualitative criteria including visual subordination, minimal public visibility, and the Council's own assessment of appropriate scale.
Framework references: 154
Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®