Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 January 20263375456

35 Highfield Lane, Tyttenhanger, ST. ALBANS, AL4 0RH

small rear extension to square off back of house, extend side extension to back of house

Authority
St Albans City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bennett T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal, despite exceeding quantitative SPG thresholds, would not result in a disproportionate addition when assessed against qualitative criteria including visual subordination, minimal public visibility, and the Council's own assessment of appropriate scale.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.