Planning appeal decision
Plot R/O - 92 Albert Road, Caversham, Reading , Berkshire, RG4 7PL
Planning appeal 3376303 at Plot R/O - 92 Albert Road, Caversham, Reading , Berkshire, RG4 7PL (Reading Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 May 2026 by Inspector Murphy S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would secure acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outside private amenity space.
erection of a detached dwelling
- Authority
- Reading Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Murphy S
- Postcode
- RG4 7PL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would secure acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outside private amenity space
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for BNG
- the effect of the proposal on trees; including protected trees
- whether the proposal adequately secures affordable housing
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to scale, plot coverage, and layout
What decided it
The adverse impacts from inadequate private amenity space, unresolved biodiversity net gain, pressure on protected trees, and lack of affordable housing contributions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of one additional dwelling.
The adverse impacts from inadequate private amenity space, insufficient biodiversity net gain provision, pressure on protected trees, and lack of affordable housing contributions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of delivering one additional dwelling and associated economic benefits, when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CC8Policy H10Policy EN12Policy EN14Policy H3Policy CC9Policy CC7Policy H11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 96Paragraph 124Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 187Paragraph 193Paragraph 203Paragraph 205
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reading Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed19 October 20266002958Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
- Allowed19 October 20266002957Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
- Dismissed19 October 20266002956Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
- Dismissed19 October 20266002955Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
- Dismissed25 September 2026601462565a Bedford Road, Reading, RG1 7EX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®