Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted13 May 20263376745

Land to the Front of the Paddocks , Meadow View & The Stables, Greensforge, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU

Planning appeal 3376745 at Land to the Front of the Paddocks , Meadow View & The Stables, Greensforge, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed on 13 May 2026 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt.

Without planning permission, the construction of boundary structures over one metre in height from ground level adjacent to the highway comprising walls, seventeen pillars and three access gates

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
McGlone A
Postcode
DY6 0AU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the proposal's effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal Conservation Area (CA) and Roman Camps at Greensforge, a Scheduled Monument (SM)
  • given that the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

Only option f), which reduced the boundary structure's height and re-profiled sections near the gate piers, produced harm to openness and character that was clearly outweighed by the security and human rights benefits, establishing very special circumstances to justify the development.

For the structure as built and options b)-e), the security and human rights benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm and other harm, so very special circumstances did not exist; for option f), the same benefits clearly outweighed the lesser identified harm, establishing very special circumstances and according with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1GB1EQ4EQ11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142
Judgments
Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266012641
    The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
  2. Allowed25 September 20266010537
    Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266008866
    The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
  4. Dismissed12 August 20266010048
    Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
  5. Dismissed15 July 20266007394
    White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.