Planning appeal decision
Land to the Front of the Paddocks , Meadow View & The Stables, Greensforge, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU
Planning appeal 3376745 at Land to the Front of the Paddocks , Meadow View & The Stables, Greensforge, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed on 13 May 2026 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
Without planning permission, the construction of boundary structures over one metre in height from ground level adjacent to the highway comprising walls, seventeen pillars and three access gates
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- DY6 0AU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the proposal's effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the proposal's effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal Conservation Area (CA) and Roman Camps at Greensforge, a Scheduled Monument (SM)
- given that the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
Only option f), which reduced the boundary structure's height and re-profiled sections near the gate piers, produced harm to openness and character that was clearly outweighed by the security and human rights benefits, establishing very special circumstances to justify the development.
For the structure as built and options b)-e), the security and human rights benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm and other harm, so very special circumstances did not exist; for option f), the same benefits clearly outweighed the lesser identified harm, establishing very special circumstances and according with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 1GB1EQ4EQ11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142
- Judgments
- Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®