Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20256000182

1a Woodlea Drive, Bromley, BR2 0UG

described on the planning application form as ‘Planning application for loft conversion and extensions and to convert the existing dwelling into 2 no. two bedroom, 1 no. one bedroom and 2 no. studio flats with associative bins and cycle stores

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Fish A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers
  • whether the proposed development would deliver biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate compliance with the statutory biodiversity net gain requirement, which the Inspector assigned significant weight against the proposal, outweighed the moderate benefit of additional housing supply.

the significant weight assigned against the proposal for lack of biodiversity net gain outweighed the moderate benefit of additional housing, such that adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed benefits under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework

Framework references: 11, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of The London Plan adopted March 2021, Policy D4 of The London Plan adopted March 2021, Policy H2 of The London Plan adopted March 2021, Policy D6 of The London Plan adopted March 2021, Policy 4 of the Bromley Local Plan adopted January 2019, Policy 37 of the Bromley Local Plan adopted January 2019

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.