Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 January 20266000200

65 Shepherds Hill, Romford, RM30NP

single storey rear extension and first floor side extension following conversion of existing garage

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 63 Shepherds Hill with regard to outlook

What decided it

The modest scale, design, and siting of the extensions, particularly the set-back first-floor side extension which is narrower and shorter than the main dwelling, ensure the proposal would not result in disproportionate additions to the original building and would remain subordinate within the street scene.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy G2 of the London Plan, Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan, Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.