Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 January 20266000394

106 Cranham Gardens, Upminster, London, RM14 1JN

rear/side extensions with first floor rear extension and internal alterations

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nutman E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The careful design of the extensions, particularly the complementary hipped roof profile and alignment with neighbouring rear extensions, ensures they would blend acceptably with the host dwelling and surrounding area without harming character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7, Policy 26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.