Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20266000423

Land Adjacent to 5 Magnum Close, Rainham, RM13 3PU

Planning appeal 6000423 at Land Adjacent to 5 Magnum Close, Rainham, RM13 3PU (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 13 February 2026 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on highway safety.

construction of 3 new dwellings with associated landscaping and parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sibley G
Postcode
RM13 3PU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate servicing arrangements for the proposed dwellings
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of the proposed development with regard to crime and safety
  • whether the proposal would prejudice future development of the neighbouring garage block site

What decided it

The lack of a secured, unobstructed access width at the point where vehicles must pass through the garage block site, combined with the inability to prevent third-party parking obstruction and the absence of any binding mechanism to control this, created a realistic and continuing prospect that safe and suitable access could not be maintained for the lifetime of the development.

The benefits of delivering three dwellings to address the identified housing shortfall and the economic and social benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of unsafe access and inadequate servicing arrangements that could not be resolved by condition.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10 HLPPolicy 26 HLPPolicy 24 HLPPolicy 35 HLPPolicy D6 LPPolicy T4 LPPolicy D11 LP
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.