Planning appeal decision
235 Farnham Road, Slough, SL2 1DE
Planning appeal 6000580 at 235 Farnham Road, Slough, SL2 1DE (Slough Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 December 2025 by Inspector Owen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
erection of a ground floor retail side extension to existing shop in front building, and extended storage in extended basement; demolition of the existing rear building, (consisting of existing rooftop carpark over existing kitchens and existing commercial buildings), and erection of 3 storey, rear extension over semi-basement, to provide 5 x 2 Bed + 13 x 1 bed flats; ancillary works including reinstatement of pavement on Farnham Road
- Authority
- Slough Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Owen A
- Postcode
- SL2 1DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect on highway safety
- whether the development would be required to provide financial contributions towards affordable housing, local infrastructure and to mitigate any impact on the integrity of the Burnham Beeches Special Area of Conservation (SAC), and if so whether a suitable mechanism to secure that has been provided
- the effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties in respect of their outlook
- whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for its future occupiers in respect of their outlook and noise
- whether the development would promote sustainable modes of travel
What decided it
The inevitable harmful effect on character and appearance from a three-storey extension of the scale necessary to provide 18 flats, combined with unacceptable highway safety impacts and failure to secure affordable housing, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery on a brownfield site in a sustainable location.
The conflicts with policies relating to design, affordable housing and highway safety significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the provision of 18 flats on a brownfield site in a sustainable location and the economic benefits associated with that at a time when there is an insufficient supply of housing locally, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Local Plan (2004) policy EN1Local Plan (2004) policy EN3Local Plan (2004) policy T8Core Strategy (2008) Core Policy 1Core Strategy (2008) Core Policy 4Core Strategy (2008) Core Policy 7Core Strategy (2008) Core Policy 8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 116Paragraph 125Paragraph 135Paragraph 139
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Slough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 2026601408472 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
- Dismissed8 October 2026601186647, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
- Notice upheld28 September 2026337397662 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
- Notice varied and upheld25 September 20263369048Land at 33 Hillside, Slough, SL1 2RW
- Allowed25 September 202660107309, Yew Tree Road, Slough, SL1 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®