Planning appeal decision
44 Rutland Way, Orpington, BR5 4DZ
Planning appeal 6000618 at 44 Rutland Way, Orpington, BR5 4DZ (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 15 December 2025 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
6 New Build Dwellings with parking, landscaping and associated landscaping
- Authority
- London Borough of Bromley
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright A
- Postcode
- BR5 4DZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to the provision of external amenity space
- the effect of the proposed scheme on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings, with particular regard to privacy
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the absence of very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, provided the decisive reason for dismissal.
The benefits of housing delivery (modest weight), economic and social benefits (limited weight), accessibility (limited weight), biodiversity net gain (limited weight) and landscape enhancement (limited weight) do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and other identified harms to character and appearance and living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 (London Plan)Policy D3 (London Plan)Policy D6 (London Plan)Policy H2 (London Plan)Policy D4 (London Plan)Policy T5 (London Plan)Policy 49 (Bromley Local Plan)Policy 3 (Bromley Local Plan)Policy 4 (Bromley Local Plan)Policy 37 (Bromley Local Plan)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Bromley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Split Decision5 August 20263378375Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
- Dismissed30 April 20266005662336 Main Road, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, TN16 2HL
- Allowed17 April 20266000833Land Between 127 & 129 Leaves Green Road, Keston, BR2 6DG
- Allowed10 April 202660008296 Woodlands Road, Bickley, Bromley, Kent, BR1 2AD
- Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263343405Land to the Rear of 50 to 54 Cudham Lane, Cudham, TN14 7QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®