Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 November 20256000653

Baytree Cottage, Arlingham, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL2 7JH

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edwards J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the integrity of the habitat sites
  • its effect on highway safety
  • its effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the development provides a satisfactory private garden for occupants

What decided it

The development would adversely affect the integrity of the habitat sites and could not be adequately mitigated without a section 106 obligation, which the appellant had not secured, and this harm engaged the strong protection afforded by paragraph 195 of the NPPF.

The modest benefits of housing delivery, efficient reuse of an existing building, and support for rural community vitality were outweighed by the potential adverse effects on the integrity of the habitat sites, which engaged the strong protection policies of the NPPF.

Framework references: 11, 195

Plan policies cited: ES6, ES3, CP13, HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.