Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20266000752

75 London Road, Brimscombe, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 2SF

Planning appeal 6000752 at 75 London Road, Brimscombe, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 2SF (Stroud District Council) was dismissed on 2 February 2026 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

outline application for the construction of a dwellinghouse

Authority
Stroud District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K
Postcode
GL5 2SF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to whether the proposal would be overbearing to 75 London Road and 76 London Road
  • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposal on the Rodborough Common Special Area of Conservation and the Cotswold Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The proposed dwelling would erode the positive effect of gaps between existing dwellings set within large plots and would appear cramped and overdeveloped, thereby adversely affecting the character and appearance of the area contrary to Policies HC1 and CP14 of the Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP1CP3HC1CP14ES3ES6LRD1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stroud

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266010245
    Bassett Court Farm, North Nibley, GL11 6DQ
  2. Allowed14 October 20266006756
    Land at Haines Green, Edge Road, Painswick, Gl5 6NE
  3. Allowed13 October 20266009483
    Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
  4. Allowed5 October 20266007595
    Land at Epney, Framilode, Gloucester, GL27LL
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266005652
    Agricultural Barn, Upton Hill, Upton St Leonards, GL4 8DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.