Planning appeal decision
35 Lower Cippenham Lane, Slough, SL1 5DG
Planning appeal 6000888 at 35 Lower Cippenham Lane, Slough, SL1 5DG (Slough Borough Council) was dismissed on 5 February 2026 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 35, 37 and 39 Lower Cippenham Lane with regards to privacy, noise and disturbance, the outlook from No 35 and the provision of outdoor space for Nos 35 and 37.
construction of 4no. dwellings with associated parking, bins & cycle stores
- Authority
- Slough Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chalk M
- Postcode
- SL1 5DG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 35, 37 and 39 Lower Cippenham Lane with regards to privacy, noise and disturbance, the outlook from No 35 and the provision of outdoor space for Nos 35 and 37
- Whether the development would provide sufficient private outdoor space for the occupiers of the proposed houses
- Whether it would make sufficient provision for biodiversity net gain
- Whether it would provide safe and adequate vehicular access
- Whether it would provide adequate on-site parking
- Whether it would provide adequate arrangements for bin storage and collection
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether it would provide safe access for pedestrians to the highway
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the living conditions of occupiers of Nos 35 and 37 through loss of privacy, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and highway safety concerns, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of delivering four new homes in an area with acute housing need.
The considerable weight given to the delivery of four new homes in a borough with only 2.2 years' housing land supply and housing delivery shortfall, together with moderate weight for economic benefits, was substantially and demonstrably outweighed by unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, inadequate future occupier amenity space, highway safety risks, and failure to demonstrate biodiversity net gain.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 8Core Policy 7Core Policy 9Core Policy 1Core Policy 4EN1EN3H13H14H15T2
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Limited v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney (2017) EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Slough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 2026601408472 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
- Dismissed8 October 2026601186647, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
- Notice upheld28 September 2026337397662 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
- Notice varied and upheld25 September 20263369048Land at 33 Hillside, Slough, SL1 2RW
- Allowed25 September 202660107309, Yew Tree Road, Slough, SL1 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®