Planning appeal decision
6 Matford Lane, Exeter, EX2 4PS
Planning appeal 6000961 at 6 Matford Lane, Exeter, EX2 4PS (Exeter City Council) was dismissed on 25 March 2026 by Inspector Kay D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Leonards Conservation Area.
the demolition of existing bungalow and garage and replacement with bungalow with rooms in roof, garage and outbuilding with associated landscaping
- Authority
- Exeter City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Kay D
- Postcode
- EX2 4PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Leonards Conservation Area
What decided it
The proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Leonards Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset, causing less than substantial harm that would not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of construction-phase economic benefit, energy efficiency, and biodiversity enhancement, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development not applying due to the heritage harm exception in footnote 7 of the Framework
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Objectives 8 and 9Policy CP17Policies C1 and DG1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Schneck v SSHCLG & West Berkshire DC [2022] EWHC 3335 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Exeter
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed17 August 20266006617Springbank, Beech Avenue, Exeter, EX4 6HE
- Dismissed2 July 20253358070396 Topsham Road, Exeter, EX2 6HE
- Dismissed27 October 2026601210370-72 Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LP
- Dismissed20 October 2026601032413C St. James Road, Exeter, EX4 6PY
- Dismissed7 October 2026601549141 Well Street, Exeter, EX4 6QQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®