Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 April 20266001124

Field West of White Cross Sx702396, Malborough, Kingsbridge, Devon, TQ7 3JQ

Planning appeal 6001124 at Field West of White Cross Sx702396, Malborough, Kingsbridge, Devon, TQ7 3JQ (South Hams District Council) was dismissed on 10 April 2026 by Inspector Kay D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal development is an appropriate form of development, having regard to its location and its accordance with the spatial strategy of the development plan.

an application for concrete hardstand area

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Kay D
Postcode
TQ7 3JQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal development is an appropriate form of development, having regard to its location and its accordance with the spatial strategy of the development plan
  • The effect of the development on the South Devon National Landscape and the Undeveloped Coast policy area

What decided it

The appeal development conflicts with policy TTV26(2) of the Joint Local Plan as it does not respond to a proven agricultural, forestry and other occupational need that requires a countryside location, and fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances required by policy DEV24 for development in the Undeveloped Coast area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy TTV1Policy TTV26Policy DEV24

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Hams

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014394
    Baidland, Downs Road, Thurlestone, TQ7 3NF
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013915
    East View, Crescent Road, Ivybridge, PL21 0BP
  3. Allowed13 October 20266009730
    Airwaves Solutions Limited, DAC157, Communication Station, Road From Bolberry to Waterfern, Bolberry, TQ7 3DY
  4. Allowed13 October 20266009219
    Land at Chipple Park, Lutton, Ivybridge, PL21 9TA
  5. Dismissed7 October 20266006171
    Hazel Paddock, Land At Sx 774 389, East Portlemouth, Salcombe, TQ8 8PA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.