Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 January 20266001268

Rose Cottage, 39 The Street, Brettenham, Suffolk, IP7 7QP

Authority
Babergh District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bennett T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species, with particular regard to Great Crested Newts

What decided it

The rear extension would not respect the scale and form of the host property and would result in adverse effects on its traditional character and appearance, conflicting with development plan policies requiring high-quality design that maintains existing character.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: LP03, LP24, SP09, LP16, BRET 9, BRET 6, BRET 1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.