Planning appeal decision
2 Culverhay, Compton Dando, Bristol, BS39 4LQ
a two-storey rear extension to provide additional living accommodation
- Authority
- Bath and North East Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Clifford E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether any harm by reasons of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The site-specific factors—particularly the two-storey design limiting footprint, the extension not exceeding 50% of the host dwelling's depth, and alignment with the adjoining extension—meant the proposal was not a disproportionate addition despite the 60% volume increase, bringing it within the Paragraph 154(c) exception.
Framework references: 154
Plan policies cited: Policy CP8, Policy GB1, Policy GB3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®