Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 May 20266001384

2 Culverhay, Compton Dando, Bristol, BS39 4LQ

a two-storey rear extension to provide additional living accommodation

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clifford E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reasons of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The site-specific factors—particularly the two-storey design limiting footprint, the extension not exceeding 50% of the host dwelling's depth, and alignment with the adjoining extension—meant the proposal was not a disproportionate addition despite the 60% volume increase, bringing it within the Paragraph 154(c) exception.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy CP8, Policy GB1, Policy GB3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.