Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 February 20266001501

Egbury Farm Barns, Egbury Road, St Mary Bourne, SP11 6DL

Planning appeal 6001501 at Egbury Farm Barns, Egbury Road, St Mary Bourne, SP11 6DL (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 February 2026 by Inspector Wilson D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be appropriately located having regard to the Council's development plan policies and access to services and facilities.

erection of 4 dwellings and associated landscaping and car parking following the demolition of existing buildings and removal of hardstanding

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilson D
Postcode
SP11 6DL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be appropriately located having regard to the Council's development plan policies and access to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would conserve and enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape
  • the effect of the proposed development on the settings of a nearby listed building and a non-designated heritage asset
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of European sites, with particular regard to nutrient neutrality
  • flood risk with regard to surface water
  • whether an appropriate mix of dwellings would be provided
  • whether adequate provision would be made for affordable housing

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the proposal would not have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Solent and Southampton Water European sites due to nutrient neutrality concerns provided a strong reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11d(i) that overrode the housing supply shortfall.

The heritage balance: less than substantial harm to heritage assets was outweighed by the small contribution to housing supply (significant weight), but this was displaced by the nutrient neutrality issue which provided a strong reason for refusal under the tilted balance, preventing the presumption in favour of sustainable development from applying.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy P1Policy SD1Policy CN9Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy CN3Policy P5Policy P7Policy EM4Policy EM7Policy P3Policy CN1Policy EM11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 83Paragraph 187Paragraph 189Paragraph 175Paragraph 170Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 216Paragraph 215Paragraph 72Paragraph 11Paragraph 65

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

No other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011048
    Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
  2. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266011464
    Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266011822
    Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266011099
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.