Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20266001564

Lickey Banker,, Ormond Road, Rednal,, Birmingham,, B45 0JD

Planning appeal 6001564 at Lickey Banker,, Ormond Road, Rednal,, Birmingham,, B45 0JD (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 3 February 2026 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would cause harm to the vitality and viability of local centres.

change of use from former public house (Sui Generis) to convenience retail unit (Use Class E)

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
B45 0JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would cause harm to the vitality and viability of local centres
  • whether the proposed development would result in an over concentration of retail provision

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide explicit evidence of a sequential test demonstrating the absence of suitable sites within the nearest designated local centre at Frankley, contrary to the requirements of NPPF paragraph 91 and Policy TP22 of the Birmingham Development Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy TP22Policy TP24Policy TP23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 91Paragraph 95

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012986
    Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266011902
    Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266013662
    22 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266015503
    60 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266015146
    9Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.