Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 March 20266001730

23 - 29 Sackville Road, Bexhill, TN39 3JD

partial change of use to sui generis 10 person HMO including alterations and extensions

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Housden C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the occupying conditions of the users of 31 Sackville Road, with specific regard to overlooking from the proposal to its private amenity space
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with specific regard to the location of the communal space, privacy, daylight and sunlight, floor area, outlook and location of the wet rooms
  • the living conditions of nearby neighbours with regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The significant harm to the living conditions of future occupiers through inadequate communal space access and severe privacy loss, combined with harm to the neighbouring property's amenity space through overlooking, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the housing benefits despite the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply.

The significant adverse effects of granting planning permission through harm to the living conditions of future occupiers and existing users of No 31 substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing provision on a brownfield town centre site, therefore the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 124, 130, 135, 139, 232

Plan policies cited: Policy OSS4 of the Rother Core Strategy 2014, Policy EN3 of the Rother Core Strategy 2014

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL, 1982, P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.