Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20266001890

Land Lying To The North East Of 15 East Hatley, Hatley, SG19 3JA

Planning appeal 6001890 at Land Lying To The North East Of 15 East Hatley, Hatley, SG19 3JA (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 March 2026 by Inspector Tinsley F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would comply with the spatial strategy for the area with regard to the location of housing development.

Outline application with some matters reserved except for access for the erection of 1 No. Self-Build dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tinsley F
Postcode
SG19 3JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would comply with the spatial strategy for the area with regard to the location of housing development
  • the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the village and surrounding countryside
  • the weight to be given to the need for sites for self / custom-build housing

What decided it

The conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy for housing location, combined with the inability to secure the self/custom-build delivery through a Section 106 agreement, meant that material considerations did not justify allowing the proposal contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S/11Policy S/6Policy S/7Policy TI/2Policy S/2Policy S/3Policy HQ/1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 83Paragraph 110Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

2 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed23 October 20266005101
    Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266010417
    Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266008631
    19 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011793
    Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
  5. Dismissed2 October 20266011365
    Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.