Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 February 20266002008

45 Queen Mary Avenue, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 5PL

Removal of 18m x 1.6m bush and 11m x 1.2m fence with 1m garden wide gate to be replaced by a 29m x 1.9m timber wood fence To complete the full boundary - Including the existing 4m wooden car gate and 1m walk gate Combining a complete length of 34m from number 43 to number 47 with an overall height of 1.9m Wooden fence panels screwed into wooden posts with wooden gravel boards Inside of the site boundary posts set in 1m hole filled with fast setting post mix

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Cahalane R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the appeal enclosure does not form an intrusive feature in the street scene when considered in its full context, and therefore complies with the relevant development plan policies on character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy EM1, Policy EM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.