Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20266002094

25-26 George Street, Richmond-upon-Thames, TW9 1HY

Planning appeal 6002094 at 25-26 George Street, Richmond-upon-Thames, TW9 1HY (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 April 2026 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the availability of employment space in the borough.

Change of use of first and second floors (Class E) to provide two residential units (Class C3), infill extension to second floor former lightwell, cycle storage in rear yard, provision of second floor balcony at rear and use of existing flat roof at rear for first floor roof terrace

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Robinson N
Postcode
TW9 1HY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on the availability of employment space in the borough
  • whether the development makes an appropriate contribution towards affordable housing

What decided it

The unacceptable loss of office floorspace contrary to the protectionist employment policies in the development plan, which when weighed against the modest housing benefit of 2 units, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance test.

the adverse impacts of loss of office floorspace contrary to development plan policy significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of delivering 2 residential units under the tilted balance, tipping against the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
RLP2 policy 23RLP2 policy 22RLP2 policy 11E1E2London Plan (2021)Supplementary Planning Document on Affordable Housing (2014)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

431 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.