Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 March 20266002120

Bulbarrow Pains Hill, OXTED, RH8 0RG

extension to and deep retrofit of existing dwelling comprising part two- storey and part single-storey rear extension, installation of new external wall insulation with hung-tile cladding and render, and installation of new, insulated roof structure to existing building. Other miscellaneous alterations as noted on drawings, including to fenestration

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The 75% volume increase constitutes disproportionate additions to the original building in the Green Belt, and the other considerations presented do not clearly outweigh the substantial weight afforded to Green Belt harm.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.