Planning appeal decision
21 Nags Head Lane, Brentwood, Essex, CM14 5NJ
Planning appeal 6002148 at 21 Nags Head Lane, Brentwood, Essex, CM14 5NJ (Brentwood Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 February 2026 by Inspector Reid L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect on openness.
demolition of existing house and outbuilding and erection of one replacement dwelling and five new dwellings
- Authority
- Brentwood Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Reid L
- Postcode
- CM14 5NJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect on openness
- The effect of the proposal on the character of the area
- Whether it has been demonstrated that safe vehicular access can be achieved
- Whether it has been demonstrated that the appeal site is suitable for residential development
- Whether the appeal site is in a sustainable location having regard to the spatial strategy
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and character, combined with unresolved concerns about access and site suitability, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to constitute very special circumstances.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with moderate harm to character and unresolved access and suitability issues, was not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for housing provision and economic benefits and limited weight for addressing three-bedroom house shortage and site condition, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy MG02Policy MG03Policy BE14Policy BE09Policy NE03Policy NE08Policy NE10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brentwood
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed22 October 20266007755Land at Priests Lane, Priests Lane, Brentwood, CM15 8HG
- Allowed7 October 20266009911Place Farm, Place Farm Lane, Doddinghurst, CM15 0JA
- Dismissed7 October 20266008911Pumping Station Cottage, Great Warley Street, Brentwood, CM13 3JR
- Allowed28 September 20266009849Land Adj to Grassmere, Horseman Side, Navestock, CM14 5SU
- Dismissed26 August 20266012008Wilwyn, Chelmsford Road, Blackmore, CM4 0DS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®