Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 March 20266002301

Land Adj Digberry Farm, Digberry Lane, near Park Corner, Henley on Thames, RG9 6DP

the material change in use of the land to a mixed use, comprising agricultural grazing for horses and a caravan site, to provide residential accommodation for Gypsies and Travellers, comprising a single family pitch consisting of 1 static caravan, 1 tourin g caravan, parking and associated infrastructure, new access to Digberry Lane (retrospective)

Authority
South Oxfordshire District Council
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Unknown
Inspector
Edwards J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it conserves or enhances the natural, scenic and landscape beauty of the Chilterns National Landscape
  • the matter of intentional unauthorised development

What decided it

the Council's inability to demonstrate a five years' supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches, engaging the paragraph 11(d) presumption in favour of granting permission, which the limited landscape harm did not outweigh

the limited harm to the character and appearance of the area and the National Landscape did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of addressing an identified shortfall in Gypsy and Traveller pitch supply, so the paragraph 11(d) presumption in favour of the development applied and the appeal was allowed despite conflict with the development plan

Framework references: 11, 61, 187, 189

Plan policies cited: Policy STRAT1, Policy H14, Policy DES1, Policy DES2, Policy ENV1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.