Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 April 20266002438

Land to Rear of 151 Balls Pond Road (Culford Mews), London, N1 4BG

Planning appeal 6002438 at Land to Rear of 151 Balls Pond Road (Culford Mews), London, N1 4BG (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 13 April 2026 by Inspector Cliff D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building '153, Balls Pond Road N1, 155 and 157 Balls Pond Road N1, 121-151, Balls Pond Road N1'.

demolition of existing outbuilding and construction of a three storey plus basement dwellinghouse with associated refuse and cycle storage and the installation of solar PV panels

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cliff D
Postcode
N1 4BG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building '153, Balls Pond Road N1, 155 and 157 Balls Pond Road N1, 121-151, Balls Pond Road N1'
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the De Beauvoir Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the setting and significance of the Grade II listed building from the substantial subdivision of the rear garden and extent of basement development outweighed the public benefits of the proposal, with no clear and convincing justification for the harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D3Policy HC1Policy D4Policy LP1Policy LP3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 766 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed2 October 20266007927
    47 Burma Road, Hackney, N16 9BH
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010033
    259 Wick Road, Hackney, London, E9 5DG
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266010111
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266010110
    Flat B, 83 Rectory Road, Hackney, N16 7PP
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012204
    42 Cranwich Road, Hackney, N16 5JN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.