Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 March 20266002528

Ravello, Upper Court Road, Woldingham, Surrey, CR3 7BF

erection of new electrical sliding vehicle gates and pedestrian gate and piers

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause harm to its openness and character, and the other considerations presented do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 142, 143, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy DP9, Policy DP7, Policy CSP18, Policy L1, Policy L3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.