Planning appeal decision
Ravello, Upper Court Road, Woldingham, Surrey, CR3 7BF
erection of new electrical sliding vehicle gates and pedestrian gate and piers
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Glassar S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development
What decided it
The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause harm to its openness and character, and the other considerations presented do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.
Framework references: 142, 143, 153
Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy DP9, Policy DP7, Policy CSP18, Policy L1, Policy L3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®