Planning appeal decision
Glanmire Farm, Rushett Lane, Malden Rushett, Chessington, KT18 7TR
Planning appeal 6002544 at Glanmire Farm, Rushett Lane, Malden Rushett, Chessington, KT18 7TR (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 12 May 2026 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of existing stables and barn and erection of 4 x new build dwellings
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Glassar S
- Postcode
- KT18 7TR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Compliance with the biodiversity net gain requirements
- The effect of the proposed development on archaeological assets
- If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development
What decided it
The substantial and demonstrable harm to Green Belt openness caused by the introduction of four new dwellings extending built form across the site, combined with the site's unsustainable location with minimal public transport access, could not be clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and delivery.
The lack of housing supply was given considerable weight but did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and its openness, which attracts substantial weight under the Framework; the Green Belt harm provided a strong reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, displacing the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM5 of the Kingston Core Strategy 2012Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy DM6 of the Kingston Core Strategy 2012Policy G6 of the London Plan 2021Policy DM12 of the Kingston Core Strategy 2012Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed22 May 20266004895Wighill, Old Malden Lane, Worcester Park, London, KT4 7PU
- Dismissed12 May 20266002542Glanmire Farm, Rushett Lane, Malden Rushett, Chessington, KT18 7TR
- Dismissed15 December 20253363669Land Rear of Kenwood Green Lane, Chessington, KT9 2DS
- Allowed15 December 20253245773Rushett Stables, Leatherhead Road, Chessington, KT9 2NG
- Dismissed19 November 20253366258355 Leatherhead Road, Chessington, KT9 2NQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®