Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 April 20266002650

18 Brailsford Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JU

Planning appeal 6002650 at 18 Brailsford Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JU (Nottingham City Council) was dismissed on 7 April 2026 by Inspector Bartle L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the creation and maintenance of balanced, sustainable and mixed communities.

change of use from C3 dwelling house to C4 small HMO (3 bedrooms, up to 3 residents), with associated internal alterations and fire safety measures

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Bartle L
Postcode
NG7 2JU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the creation and maintenance of balanced, sustainable and mixed communities
  • the effect of the development on neighbouring occupiers' living conditions, with particular regard to nuisance, noise and disturbance
  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development with regard to flood risk

What decided it

The proposal's contribution to an over-concentration of HMOs in an area already at 44.7% HMO/student accommodation use, combined with the absence of a Flood Risk Assessment and failure to demonstrate safe flood escape routes, rendered the development in conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HO6Policy HO1Policy 8 of the Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local PlanPolicy 10 of the Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local PlanPolicy DE1Policy DE2Policy IN2Policy 1 of the Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local PlanPolicy CC3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 181

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

113 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Nottingham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012324
    291 Wigman Road, Nottingham, NG8 4AJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266012812
    27 Western Boulevard, Nottingham, NG8 1PE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011302
    14-16 Hendon Rise, Nottingham, NG3 3AN
  4. Dismissed17 September 20266010946
    38 Highfield Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JE
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266004681
    79-81 Flat Above, Haydn Road, Nottingham, NG5 2LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.