Planning appeal decision
Malvernbury, 61 Abbey Road, Malvern, WR14 3HH
Planning appeal 6002729 at Malvernbury, 61 Abbey Road, Malvern, WR14 3HH (Malvern Hills District Council) was dismissed on 16 March 2026 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Great Malvern Conservation Area.
three-storey residential building containing six, two-bedroom flats with parking
- Authority
- Malvern Hills District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- WR14 3HH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Great Malvern Conservation Area
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupants of the property, with regard to privacy and outlook
- whether the development would provide safe and suitable access and sufficient parking for the appeal proposal and for the occupants of Malvernbury
- the effect of the development on biodiversity
- whether the proposed drainage scheme would be appropriate and whether it would increase the risk of surface water flooding
What decided it
The harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, a designated heritage asset, would not be outweighed by the public benefits and provides a strong reason for refusing the proposal under paragraph 11d of the Framework.
The substantial harm to the Conservation Area and the living conditions of future occupants, combined with highway safety and drainage concerns, outweighed the limited public benefits of six additional dwellings, particularly given that the harm to a designated heritage asset provided a strong reason for refusal that displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SWDP 6SWDP 21SWDP 24SWDP 22SWDP 28SWDP 29MD1MH2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Malvern Hills
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed13 October 20266014393The Laurels, Kerswell Green, Worcester, WR5 3PE
- Dismissed8 October 20266007831Vaughan Lodge, 192-198 Wells Road, Malvern, WR14 4HB
- Dismissed18 September 20266010196Land At (Os 7540 6621), Stourport Road, Great Witley, WR6 6JP
- Allowed11 September 20266010973Cedars Farm, Broadwas, Worcester, WR6 5NE
- Dismissed24 July 20266007092Land At (Os 5947 6754), Bromyard Road, Tenbury Wells, WR15 8DJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®