Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 September 20266010973

Cedars Farm, Broadwas, Worcester, WR6 5NE

Planning appeal 6010973 at Cedars Farm, Broadwas, Worcester, WR6 5NE (Malvern Hills) was allowed on 11 September 2026 by Inspector K Townend, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development, having regard to the development strategy for the area and the accessibility of services and facilities.

new detached dwelling with associated landscaping

Authority
Malvern Hills
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
K Townend
Postcode
WR6 5NE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development, having regard to the development strategy for the area and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • whether a suitable mechanism is available to secure a contribution towards affordable housing

What decided it

Policy S5:1(e) of the Framework permits limited infilling within groups of houses outside defined development boundaries, and the proposal qualifies as such infilling between two existing dwellings in a suitable and sustainable location.

the benefits of the development as limited infilling in a suitable location, supported by Framework policy S5:1(e), outweigh the conflict with the development plan policy restricting development outside the settlement boundary

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SWDPR 03Policy SWDPR 06Policy SWDPR 19Policy SWDPR 26Policy SWDPR 37Policy P2 of the Broadwas and Cotheridge Neighbourhood Plan, 2019

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Malvern Hills

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed13 October 20266014393
    The Laurels, Kerswell Green, Worcester, WR5 3PE
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266010196
    Land At (Os 7540 6621), Stourport Road, Great Witley, WR6 6JP
  3. Allowed13 May 20266005002
    Red Lodge, Frith Common, Eardiston, WR15 8JX
  4. Dismissed16 March 20266002729
    Malvernbury, 61 Abbey Road, Malvern, WR14 3HH
  5. Allowed8 January 20266000493
    Land at (Os 7489 5333), Knightwick Road, Alfrick, WR6 5HX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.