Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 April 20266002748

Land to the East of High Common Farm, High Common Lane, Doncaster, DN11 9HE

Erection of two self-build earth sheltered dwellings and associated infrastructure following cessation of brownfield site used for open storage use (B8)

Authority
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Heron E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies, the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework and the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposal would be consistent with local and national policies regarding housing in rural areas
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether groundwater used as a public water supply would be capable of being safeguarded
  • if the development is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The proposal's location in an isolated rural area with poor accessibility to services and facilities, combined with significant harm to the character and appearance of the rural landscape, outweighed the benefits of self-build housing provision and environmental improvements.

Framework references: 11, 83, 84, 110, 115, 154, 196

Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 2, Policy 7, Policy 13, Policy 44, Policy 54, Policy 55, Policy D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.