Planning appeal decision
Land East Side Of Pavenham Road, Felmersham, MK43 7EX
Planning appeal 6002750 at Land East Side Of Pavenham Road, Felmersham, MK43 7EX (Bedford Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2026 by Inspector Mark Brooker, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Supply of Gypsy and traveller sites in the Borough, including the specific need of the Appellant.
Change of use of agricultural land to a Gypsy and Traveller site to contain five residential pitches (comprising a total of 11 mobile homes and 4 touring caravans) including parking, associated groundworks, infrastructure and landscaping
- Authority
- Bedford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy
- Inspector
- Mark Brooker
- Postcode
- MK43 7EX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Supply of Gypsy and traveller sites in the Borough, including the specific need of the Appellant
- Whether the occupants of the site would have reasonable access to services and facilities
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether adequate provision has been made for foul drainage and energy connection
- The effect of the appeal scheme on ecology and protected species
What decided it
The cumulative and largely unmitigated harms (heritage, landscape/character, ecology, flood risk/foul drainage, and intentional unauthorised development) were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme, including the best interests of the children and human rights considerations.
the numerous identified harms (policy conflict on need, heritage harm to the setting of the Grade I listed church, landscape and character harm, ecological harm, flood risk and foul drainage harm, and intentional unauthorised development) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme, including the best interests of the children, Article 8 rights and PSED considerations, and this conclusion held even under a temporary or personal permission
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 63Policy 32Policy 50SPolicy 92Policy 41SPolicy 64(vi)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 181Paragraph 210Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bedford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed7 September 2026601082818 The Dell Kempston, Bedford, MK42 7DL
- Dismissed11 August 202660109964 Lancaster Road, Shortstown, Bedford, MK42 0UA
- Allowed24 July 20266004689Land North of Hall End Road, Wootton, MK43 9HP
- Dismissed23 July 202660088791 Park Road, Kempston, Bedford, MK42 8NY
- Dismissed10 July 20266007960Blue Diamond Garden Centre, Sandy Lane, Willington, MK44 3QP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®