Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 May 20266002754

6 Beesonend Cottages, Beesonend Lane, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2AA

single and two-storey rear and single-storey side extensions along with internal alterations and removal of rear chimney (following refusal of planning application ref 5/2025/1380)

Authority
St Albans City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fern L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposed developments on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposals

What decided it

The proposals constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to its openness, and the benefits identified do not amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.

Framework references: 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy 1, Policy 13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.