Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266002908

58 and 60 Greswell Street, London, SW6 6PP

comprehensive application to cover works previously consented by 2023/01589/FUL, 2023/03252/FUL & 2024/00386/FUL. The creation of a single dwelling from 2 apartments, basement extension with lightwells to front and rear, two storey side extension to front, single storey extension to side and rear at ground floor. 2nd floor rear extension, installation of rooflights and dormer

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sibley G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on flood risk
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including the Crabtree Conservation Area as well as the setting of the Grade II listed Grandstand and Turnstiles to Fulham Football Club

What decided it

The submitted flood risk assessment failed to adequately address residual tidal breach flood risk and did not demonstrate that basement sleeping accommodation would be safe for its lifetime, creating a conflict with development plan policies that could not be outweighed by the scheme's limited benefits.

Plan policies cited: Policy CC3, Policy DC11, Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.