Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266002908

58 and 60 Greswell Street, London, SW6 6PP

Planning appeal 6002908 at 58 and 60 Greswell Street, London, SW6 6PP (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 22 May 2026 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on flood risk.

comprehensive application to cover works previously consented by 2023/01589/FUL, 2023/03252/FUL & 2024/00386/FUL. The creation of a single dwelling from 2 apartments, basement extension with lightwells to front and rear, two storey side extension to front, single storey extension to side and rear at ground floor. 2nd floor rear extension, installation of rooflights and dormer

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sibley G
Postcode
SW6 6PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on flood risk
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including the Crabtree Conservation Area as well as the setting of the Grade II listed Grandstand and Turnstiles to Fulham Football Club

What decided it

The submitted flood risk assessment failed to adequately address residual tidal breach flood risk and did not demonstrate that basement sleeping accommodation would be safe for its lifetime, creating a conflict with development plan policies that could not be outweighed by the scheme's limited benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC3Policy DC11Policy DC1Policy DC4Policy DC8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

776 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.