Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 April 20266003042

Land Adjacent to 132, Mill Lane,, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 2LL

Planning appeal 6003042 at Land Adjacent to 132, Mill Lane,, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 2LL (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 9 April 2026 by Inspector Rawle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of 1 no 1 bed dwelling

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S
Postcode
IP11 2LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with regard to privacy
  • Whether or not the proposal would result in satisfactory access, manoeuvring and parking provision

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area through the loss of important spacing between Nos 130 and 132 significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision.

The moderate weight afforded to housing supply, self-build provision, and economic and social benefits was outweighed by the significant weight afforded to the unacceptable harm to character and appearance, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against Framework policies as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SCLP5.7SCLP11.1SCLP11.2SCLP7.2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009600
    Part Land Rear Of Grove Cottage, The Street, Little Bealings, IP13 6LT
  2. Dismissed24 August 20266009815
    115 Oulton Road, Lowestoft, NR32 4QW
  3. Allowed5 August 20266007229
    Herons, Church Field, Walberswick, Southwold, IP18 6TG
  4. Allowed5 August 20266004646
    Easton Bavents Ltd, Larks Rising, Reydon, IP18 6SS
  5. Dismissed30 July 20266005300
    Willow Farm, Top Road, Ilketshall St Andrew, NR34 8NN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.